Resupply, a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol, has confirmed an exploit in its wstUSR market. According to the project’s statement post on social media network X (formely Twitter), the affected smart contract has been identified and immediately paused. No other markets or protocol functions appear to have been impacted.
Resupply has experienced an exploit in the wstUSR market. The affected contract has been identified and paused. Only the wstUSR market was impacted and the protocol continues to function as intended. A full post-mortem will be shared as soon as a complete analysis of the…
— Resupply (@ResupplyFi) June 26, 2025
Blockchain security firm Cyvers first raised the alarm, reporting that the attacker exploited a vulnerability tied to the exchangeRate logic in a ResupplyPair contract. The attack was made possible through:
- Manipulation of the cvcrvUSD price, triggering a faulty condition in the Resupply protocol.
- A flaw in floor division math, which allowed the exchangeRate to hit zero.
The attacker then borrowed a massive amount of reUSD using just 1 wei (smallest possible fraction of Ethereum, about a billionth of a cent) of collateral — effectively exploiting the protocol’s collateral logic. The stolen funds were swapped to ETH and distributed across two wallets, with initial funding traced to Tornado Cash, a well-known Ethereum mixer often used to obscure transaction origins.
🚨ALERT🚨Our system has detected a suspicious transaction involving @ResupplyFi, with losses estimated at $9.6M.
— 🚨 Cyvers Alerts 🚨 (@CyversAlerts) June 26, 2025
Attacker funded via @TornadoCash manipulated #cvcrvUSD price, causing exchangeRate in ResupplyPair to hit zero due to floor division enabling massive #reUSD borrowing… pic.twitter.com/fU1LEUxO0t
While Resupply hasn’t yet released full details nor confirmed exact loss figures, Cyvers estimates the total value siphoned at $9.6 million. The Resupply team has paused the vulnerable contract and assured users that core protocol operations remain secure.
The exploit points to ongoing risks in DeFi systems that rely on price feeds and automated math. If market prices are manipulated or tokens have low trading volume, it can lead to major vulnerabilities — especially when smart contracts don’t handle edge cases correctly.
Leave a Reply